Comparing Planned Itineraries to Actual Routes
Overview
Comparing planned itineraries to actual routes highlights how the journey differed from expectations. This comparison improves future planning by revealing where estimates were accurate and where they were optimistic or conservative.
Key points
- Planning typically involves target daily distances, campsites, and resupply stops.
- Actual routes may include alternates, side trips, and unscheduled rest days.
- Overlaying planned and actual data shows how often and why deviations occurred.
- Reasons for changes can include weather, health, terrain, or personal preference.
- Identifying systematic underestimation or overestimation of daily capacity guides revision.
- Refining planning assumptions leads to more realistic future itineraries.
- Recognizing positive deviations, such as enjoyable side trips, is as important as noting problems.
- Comparison exercises can be done visually with maps or analytically with tables and notes.
Details
No plan survives contact with a long trail unchanged. Looking back at initial schedules and comparing them with what actually happened reveals a great deal about how a hiker’s expectations matched reality. For instance, a plan might have assumed consistent 25-kilometre days, but the actual record may show frequent shorter days in steep sections and longer days on gentle terrain. Resupply days or weather delays may have clustered differently than anticipated.
Systematic comparison helps refine future planning. If certain terrain types or elevation patterns repeatedly slowed progress, future itineraries can incorporate shorter days in similar environments. If planned rest days proved unnecessary in some stretches but essential in others, rest scheduling can be adjusted accordingly. Evaluating both the challenges and the positive surprises—such as worthwhile side trips to viewpoints or lakes—provides a balanced view that can inform how rigid or flexible future plans are often.
Disclaimer: thruhikingwiki.com is an independent, informational reference only. It is not an official source for any trail association, land manager, park, agency, or guide service. Nothing on this site is legal, safety, medical, navigation, or professional advice, and it does not replace formal training or certified instruction. Thru-hiking and backcountry travel involve significant risk. Local regulations, land manager rules, and manufacturer instructions always take priority. You are solely responsible for your planning decisions, safety practices, and compliance with applicable laws. Use this site at your own risk.
Illustrative hiking footage
The following external videos offer general visual context for typical hiking environments. They are not official route recommendations, safety instructions, or planning tools.